Are employers violating 'trainee rates'?
I am curious to know if any employers, particularly in Texas, are taking advantage of the "trainee" rate
allowed in the Federal minimum wage regs. Specifically, the regulations
allow payment of $4.25 per hour during the first 90 days of employment
for people under age 20. I'm certain in the past few if any employers
took advantage of this, as they would not be able to hire anyone. I'm
wondering now with so many people on the job market if anyone has
revisited this.
Answer Paywizard:
he "Texas Workforce" gave on Oct. 2008 a very detailed answer about
what is violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) concerning
trainees in Texas, and what is not. I've copy pasted a part of their
text below, you can find the complete text in this link: http://www.twc.state.tx.us/news/efte/advanced_flsa_issues.html#interns_trainees
I quote:" Certain
types of trainees are completely excluded from FLSA coverage. However,
the requirements for such total exclusion are quite stringent. In an
administrative letter ruling dated February 22, 1974 (WH-254, BNA WHM
99:1152), the DOL stated that if a person is considered a "trainee",
that person is not considered an "employee" and does not have to be
paid minimum wage and overtime. The letter gave the following six
criteria for the designation of a person as a trainee; commentary on
each criterion follows in italics:
-
The training,
even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the
employer, is similar to that which would be given in a vocational
school.
-
The training is for the benefit of the trainees.
-
The trainees do not displace regular employees, but work under close observation.
-
The
employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from
the activities of the trainees, and on occasion his operations may
actually be impeded.
-
The trainees are not necessarily entitled to a job at the completion of the training period.
-
The employer and the trainees understand that the trainees are not entitled to wages for the time spent in training.
The article mentions the Donovan vs. American Airlines as a landmark case in this area. The case involved a well-known training academy run by American
Airlines for flight attendants and other airline personnel; the
students received no pay for the training they received both in the
classroom and in airplanes. Further, any work they did was secondary to
the training program. Importantly, the airline was not obligated to
hire the graduates of the program, and other airlines generally
considered the training to be a good qualification for hire. See for more information than the article this link as well: http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/726/726.F2d.415.83-1661.html
A Fifth Circuit case, Atkins v. General Motors, Inc.
,
701 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir. 1983), ruled that people who participated in a
state-sponsored training program that included hands-on experience and
was designed to provide the company with a trained pool of workers were
not employees, but rather trainees.
There
are lots of blogs and articles though who are mentioning the use of
unpaid interns in violation of minimum wage and possibly overtime laws.
See therefore the links below:
http://laborlaw.typepad.com/labor_and_employment_law_/2007/11/unpaid-internsh.html
http://flsa.blogspot.com/search/label/mcdonald%27s%20flsa%20exemption%20compliance
http://blog.marketplace.nwsource.com/careercenter/hiring_interns_for_free_labor_is_a_nono.html
http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/2006/07/most-unpaid-internships-are-unlawful.html
http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/2008/11/flsapaycheck-withholding-for-reimbursement-of-training-costs.html
http://www.paemploymentlawblog.com/2007/05/articles/wage-and-hour/summer-internships-to-pay-or-not-to-pay/#more
http://uncommon-priors.com/?p=71
During trial the courts seem to find that the most important element is the
question of who primarily benefits from the arrangement, according to the Texas Workforce. If the
employer is the primary beneficiary, the individuals will be considered
employees, but if the individuals are the ones who primarily benefit
from the work experience, they will be considered trainees...
I'll hope this information is helpful for you.